Read and analyze these two presidential endorsements. Which one is more believable? Why? Do they both present a good argument, or is one more convincing? Explain why.
In the first editorial the writer, really supports and believes in Obama. He believes that he would be a good president to our country and surve us good. "After nearly two years of a grueling and ugly campaign, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois has proved that he is the right choice to be the 44th president of the United States. Mr. Obama has met challenge after challenge, growing as a leader and putting real flesh on his early promises of hope and change."
I found the first one more believable because the second one was very opinion based.
The firsts arcile gave good quotes and made me feel like i could trust the person.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment